Skip to main content
European Citizens´ Initiative Forum

European Citizens' Initiative Secrets of Success Revealed: Insider Tips on How to Get 1,6 Million Signatures and Surpass the Threshold in Twenty-One EU Member States

Updated on: 02 March 2020

European Citizens' Initiative Secrets of Success Revealed: Insider Tips on How to Get 1,6 Million Signatures and Surpass the Threshold in Twenty-One EU Member States

Citizens who care, a very clearly defined purpose, a vast and reliable network of national organisers, thousands of volunteers across the EU and advanced online campaigning skills helped this European Citizens' Initiative break the records and surpass the threshold for support in twenty-one EU Member States. Find out how they made it!

Story told by Olga Kikou, End the Cage Age Initiative representative

We organised the European citizens’ initiative End the Cage Age, because we were very concerned about the use of cages in animal farming. We have a big animal welfare movement around Europe and many citizens wanted to be more actively engaged. Our initiative gave them this opportunity. A few years ago, in the European Parliament, we had a successful vote on the welfare of farmed rabbits. Rabbits are almost entirely farmed in cages, so it was an opportunity for us to tell the world about life in cages. Then we decided not to limit this to just rabbits, but to expand it to all the animals who are farmed in cages, and to use a tool to get citizens to participate in the activities of the European institutions.

We got engaged in the European Citizens’ Initiative process and we put together, after a lot of work and a lot of planning, the text of our proposal, which we then submitted to the European Commission for registration. We developed a very good and very big network of organisations that helped us, worked with us, and helped us expand first of all the network, and second, to spread the message across Europe. Our message was about a future without  cage farming. The message had many positive elements. Of course, we had to look at reality, but we also had to look at the future and present alternatives.

This was an opportunity for us to do a lot of research into alternatives - what do we want to tell citizens', what do we want to tell the Commission about the future of farming? Following all this research we went to citizens and started talking to them and told them about our ideas.

We shaped our ideas with them. It wasn't just coming from us, but we learned a lot from them.

"What's wonderful about the European Citizens' Initiative process is the fact that you get feedback from the citizens; and this is what the EU institutions should also take advantage of,  that they have the opportunity to learn from citizens."  

The network

One of the first things we decided to do was to develop the network. We managed to get about a hundred and seventy federations and organisations across Europe to join us in in this effort to spread the word; and they committed to spreading the word themselves. This is not an easy task. it's very cumbersome trying to bring others to join you in what you're doing, it involved a lot of planning and a lot of work from our side.  We were not the only organisation involved in this, we had many on our side.

cage

Something that is very important nowadays is the fact that most signatures are collected online and not on paper. That means that most of our statements of support came from citizens who went on the Internet and signed the European citizens' initiative online. Very few of them are collected on paper during events and in the streets. In the past, campaigning had a very public face and was very much out in the squares, in the streets talking to people directly. Now this has changed,  therefore we had to change too. Social media has become a very important tool in spreading the message, we are very much aware of this and we have used various social media tools to make this happen.

Lessons regarding signature collection

First, you have to develop a network that you can depend on, a network of people and organisations that support your cause;  and second, you have to pay a lot of attention to your online campaigning.

Another important lesson for us was volunteer participation. We depend on volunteers. We need to have volunteers across Europe. The ECI is not just a national tool, it's an EU tool, so we need to have presence in many countries and of course we cannot afford to do this without volunteers, citizens who care about the issue, who then take this issue on and spread the message in their own home countries.

There will be ups and downs

When we started signature collection, we saw that there's a big rush in the beginning, lots of citizens signing, however later on, maybe after a month or two – three months, numbers tend to fall down, so you need to be prepared to face this. You need to come up with other tools and other ways to bring the signatures back up again, to keep citizens interested, so they spread the word. Public campaigning is very important, using a number of different campaign tools is also important and just be aware that you won't have the same interest throughout the year. There will be ups and downs, but it's good to maintain a good number throughout the year. Be  prepared to go to a second plan or a third plan in case your numbers start dropping.

Planning and goal setting

Before we embarked on this ECI process we had a very long time of reflection on what we have done before and what we were going to do. Planning is very important and coming up with a very clear goal is very important too, so that the EU institutions not only know what your ECI is about, but also how this proposal could be carried out by them and could be supported by them.

"Having a very, very clear statement about what you would like to get out of your proposal is essential."  

It isn’t easy!

I would like to point out that starting an ECI as an organiser is a cumbersome process. It involves a lot of time and many people working together, so therefore I wouldn't want to create any false hopes that this is an easy thing to do. It is not. It is quite difficult,

"It takes a lot of time, and it takes a lot of planning, and it takes a lot of people."

Even if the idea is good, still just the idea by itself will not work if others are not quite engaged and committed to carrying this out.

There will be many challenges during the year of the collection phase, and before, and after it. Especially if you have a successful ECI, then you have to talk to the European institutions, you have to engage with them further. It doesn't end on the day when the signature collection phase ends.

The European Citizens’ Initiative Forum comes at a very good time because we've had the experience with a number of ECIs already and quite a few of them were successful, so there are many people around that you can depend on to discuss your ECI, to learn from their experience, and to see and plan your own work in the future. We have many individuals, many citizens who participated in ECI’s actively, also many organisers and you can depend on them to provide information for you. It's a learning process, learning from what has happened in the past but also planning ahead,  and as long as you take on these good experiences from others and you listen to others and you're able to also ask questions, you will be in a very good place to start your own ECI.

So, come and join the Forum, let's discuss what your plans are, let's see what you want to do and learn from each other and we look forward to working with you in the future!

kikou

Contributors

Olga Kikou

Olga Kikou is Head of the EU office of Compassion in World Farming, an international organisation with offices and representations in nine European countries, the US, China and South Africa, dedicated to improving farm animal welfare, ending industrial animal agriculture and achieving sustainable food and farming. Having worked in international organisations in the non-profit sector and in research and planning, she has directed her efforts towards raising awareness on the importance of citizen participation. Olga has a long-time involvement in animal advocacy and is currently lobbying the EU Institutions on key interests concerning the interlinked areas of farm animal welfare, food and farming, raising the profile of these issues on the policy making agenda, by engaging with stakeholders, exploring synergies and developing joint strategies to influence policy in the above areas. Olga is also a substitute representative of the Citizens’ Committee for the End The Cage Age ECI.

Get in touch with Olga on the European Citizens’ Initiative Forum

Leave a comment

To be able to add comments, you need to authenticate or register.

Comments

Luis Cristian Vanella | 09 October 2024

I would like to understand the whole process of the CIE to verify the possibility of making a proposal to promote peace in conflict areas through the establishment of the European Civil Peace Corps (ECPC), which have as their fundamental purpose to create the conditions so that the inhabitants of these territories can become the protagonists of a process of social, economic, civil regeneration of their territory, and of a process of creative management of differences.
This is an extremely complex and delicate task which, being based on the valorisation of common rather than specialist knowledge, is better carried out in a dialogue between operators and civil society actors; moreover, relying also on the implementation of initiatives that arise from the active listening of interlocutors, it cannot be heterodirected, it requires forms of reporting and monitoring a posteriori and great managerial and political authority (similar, mutatis mutandi, to that enjoyed by the European Central Bank).
The CCPE are bearers of a promise of regeneration at 360 degrees that must be able to manifest itself in initiatives of concrete transformation of the conditions of local coexistence linked to a practice of creative transformation of conflicts. A promise that, to become a shared heritage, must be able to demonstrate its effectiveness and effectiveness thanks to adequate financial resources.
The attribution to the EPCs of a superordinate mission (which responds to the basic needs of a large part of the population beyond contingent conflicts) also has the advantage of encouraging coordination - almost always absent - between the initiatives of the other organizations, with an increase in the effectiveness of all the interventions.
Since the times and experience of the civil war in the former Yugoslavia, studies have multiplied on the limits of the structures and institutions that
governments and the UN have at their disposal to avoid the use of violence in disputes between states and within them, and the awareness has grown that a real paradigm shift in governance systems is necessary if security and peace are to be guaranteed.
It is, in fact, a question of putting in place a reversal: if it is assumed that the failure to transform conflicts leads to violence, CCPEs are the central mechanism that a peace-keeping government must have, and military and police devices are complementary competences.
It is no coincidence that the European Parliament, already in 2001, reiterated the need for the establishment of a European Civil Peace Corps, whose task would be to coordinate, at European level, the training and deployment of civilian specialists to carry out practical peace measures such as arbitration, mediation, the distribution of non-partisan information, de-traumatisation and confidence-building between warring parties, humanitarian aid, reintegration, rehabilitation, reconstruction, education, monitoring and improvement of the human rights situation, including the accompaniment of human rights defenders (European Parliament, A5-0394/2001). The continuation of violence on Ukraine’s borders, certainly since before 2014, the inability of all government bodies at all levels and of the OECD missions themselves to be genuinely involved in a path of pacification of the local populations, as well as the outcome of the ferocious aggression by the Russian Federation, are events that the European community cannot limit itself to addressing by providing defensive weapons to the country attacked. His task, which can no longer be postponed, is to find ways to make credible, concrete and effective the universal right to security and peace and, therefore, to the prevention and creative transformation of conflicts. It is particularly significant that, in the front row, calling for the establishment of CCPEs, it is precisely the Ukrainian people who are paying for
these shortcomings with the sacrifice of thousands of young lives.